From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ehea: error handling improvement Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100420.191602.228303800.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4BCC47AB.2090600@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: raisch@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: osstklei@de.ibm.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BCC47AB.2090600@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Klein Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:08:11 +0200 > Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein > --- > > Patch created against 2.6.34-rc4 There are several problems with these patches: 1) They are corrupted by your email client, lines unchanged begin with one space character instead of two. Therefore even 'patch' wouldn't accept these changes. 2) The double slash in the patch file paths make git not accept the change. Please don't put double-slashes in your patch paths as that canonically means "/". 3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these against net-next-2.6, thanks.