From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:27:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20100427042744.GD2510@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20100422145640.GB3228@redhat.com> <20100422160144.GC2524@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100423194255.GE2589@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100425023455.GM2440@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100426160925.GD2529@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Miles Lane , Vivek Goyal , Eric Paris , Lai Jiangshan , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , nauman@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Gui Jianfeng , Li Zefan , Johannes Berg To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > > > Eric Dumazet traced these down to a commit from Eric Biederman. > > > > If I don't hear from Eric Biederman in a few days, I will attempt a > > patch, but it would be more likely to be correct coming from someone > > with a better understanding of the code. ;-) > > I already replied. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/21/420 You did indeed!!! This experience is giving me an even better appreciation of the maintainers' ability to keep all their patches straight! I will put together something based on your suggestion. Thanx, Paul