From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] sfc: Ignore parity errors in the other port's SRAM Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100428.124515.112615165.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1272482722.2549.17.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49092 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753583Ab0D1TpK (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:45:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1272482722.2549.17.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:25:22 +0100 > From: Steve Hodgson > > Siena has a separate SRAM bank for each port. On single-port boards > these can be merged together, so each port has an interrupt flag for > parity errors in the other port's SRAM. Currently we do not enable > such merging and should mask this interrupt source. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Applied.