From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Yurij.Plotnikov@oktetlabs.ru
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15868] New: Deleting IP address from interface doesn't prevent sending a data.
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:42:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428074244.304683c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-15868-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:11:02 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15868
>
> Summary: Deleting IP address from interface doesn't prevent
> sending a data.
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: IPV4
> AssignedTo: shemminger@linux-foundation.org
> ReportedBy: Yurij.Plotnikov@oktetlabs.ru
> Regression: No
>
>
> Starting from 2.6.26, Linux kernel has strange behavior for the interface with
> two IPv4 addresses.
>
> Let A and B are hosts with directly connected interfaces ethA (on host A) and
> ethB (on host B). Let 10.10.0.1/24 and 10.10.0.3/24 addresses are assigned to
> ethA and 10.10.0.2/24 address is assigned to ethB. Let there is established TCP
> connection between host A and host B with sockets sock_A and sock_B that are
> bound to 10.10.0.3 and 10.10.0.2 addresses respectively. Then if someone
> deletes 10.10.0.3 address from ethA interface and after that send some data
> from sock_A socket then the data will be delivered to sock_B socket and someone
> can read it from this socket.
>
> There is the same picture for UDP sockets. With previous definitions if there
> are UDP sockets sock_A on host A and sock_B on host B and they are bound to
> 10.10.0.3 and 10.10.0.2 addresses respectively and they are connected to
> 10.10.0.2 and 10.10.0.3 addresses respectively then if someone deletes
> 10.10.0.3 address from ethA interface and after that send some data using
> send() function from sock_A then the data will be delivered to sock_B.
>
> The data will not be sent in both cases if there are no addresses assigned to
> the interface after address removing.
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-28 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-15868-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2010-04-28 11:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-28 17:00 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 15868] New: Deleting IP address from interface doesn't prevent sending a data David Miller
2010-04-28 14:02 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100428074244.304683c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Yurij.Plotnikov@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).