From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bhaskie@gmail.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 10:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100507101451.1b4286b7@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273210329.2222.42.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Fri, 07 May 2010 07:32:09 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 mai 2010 à 22:04 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> > > This code should be completely rewritten for linux-2.6.35, its very ugly
> > > and over complex, yet it is not scalable.
> > >
> > > It could use true percpu data, with no central lock or refcount.
> >
> > Yes I've always disliked the way the TCP MD5 pool stuff is coded, it's
> > frankly crap and this is like the 5th major bug that had to get fixed
> > in it. :-)
> >
> > But let's fix this as simply as possible in net-2.6 and -stable, so Eric
> > let me know when you have a tested patch for me to apply.
>
> There are so many things ...
>
> I am comtemplating commit aa133076
>
> __tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool() now do a :
>
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), sk->sk_allocation);
>
> But later call :
>
> hash = crypto_alloc_hash("md5", 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
>
> (GFP_KERNEL allocations for sure)
>
>
> tcp_v4_parse_md5_keys() also use :
>
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), sk->sk_allocation);
>
> right after a (possibly sleeping) copy_from_user()
>
> Oh well...
>
>
> I'll test the already suggested patch before official submission,
> thanks.
Forget the per cpu data; the pool should just be scrapped.
The only reason the pool exists is that the crypto hash state which
should just be moved into the md5_info (88 bytes). The pseudo
header can just be generated on the stack before passing to the crypto
code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <i2h571fb4001005031027y4a58c4dtfd28ddcdc08d8401@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04 3:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 11:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-05-04 14:28 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 16:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 17:08 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-05 18:03 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-05 18:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-06 11:55 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-06 12:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 5:04 ` David Miller
2010-05-07 5:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:14 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-05-07 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 21:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 14:55 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-10 15:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 17:27 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 4:08 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-11 8:23 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 3:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 22:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-12 22:24 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 19:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 20:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 3:49 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-17 5:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 17:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 20:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 21:04 ` [PATCH] tcp: tcp_synack_options() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 5:35 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 7:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP David Miller
2010-05-07 8:46 ` Lars Eggert
2010-05-07 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 9:12 ` David Miller
2010-05-07 5:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 8:59 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 9:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 10:50 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 15:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 7:37 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 7:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100507101451.1b4286b7@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bhaskie@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).