netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: markgross@thegnar.org
Cc: mgross@linux.intel.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.eu,
	e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [patch] pm_qos update fixing mmotm 2010-05-11 -dies in pm_qos_update_request()
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 00:21:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005170021.25427.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100515214256.GA3506@thegnar.org>

On Saturday 15 May 2010, mgross wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 May 2010, mgross wrote:
> > > I apologize for the goofy email address.  
> > > 
> > > The following is a fix for the crash reported by Valdis.
> > > 
> > > The problem was that the original pm_qos silently fails when a request
> > > update is passed to a parameter that has not been added to the list
> > > yet.  It seems that the e1000e is doing this.  This update restores this
> > > behavior.
> > > 
> > > I need to think about how to better handle such abuse, but for now this
> > > restores the original behavior.
> > 
> > Can you please post a signed-off incremental patch against
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/suspend-2.6.git for-llinus
> > 
> > that contains your original PM QOS update?
> 
> No problem:
>
> Signed-off-by: markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>

Thanks!  Do you want to use this address for the sign-off or the Intel one?

Rafael

 
> From 487b8dcaeb66d3c226d4c06c1bd99689f93024be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: mgross <mgross@mgross-desktop.(none)>
> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:30:15 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Gard against pm_qos users calling API before registering a proper
>  request.
> 
> This update handles a use case where pm_qos update requests need to
> silently fail if the update is being sent to a handle that is null.
> 
> The problem was that the original pm_qos silently fails when a request
> update is passed to a parameter that has not been added to the list yet.
> This update restores that behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: markgross <markgross@thegnar.org>
> 
> ---
>  kernel/pm_qos_params.c |   26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/pm_qos_params.c b/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> index a1aea04..f42d3f7 100644
> --- a/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> +++ b/kernel/pm_qos_params.c
> @@ -252,19 +252,21 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request_list *pm_qos_req,
>  	int pending_update = 0;
>  	s32 temp;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
> -	if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> -		temp = pm_qos_array[pm_qos_req->pm_qos_class]->default_value;
> -	else
> -		temp = new_value;
> -
> -	if (temp != pm_qos_req->value) {
> -		pending_update = 1;
> -		pm_qos_req->value = temp;
> +	if (pm_qos_req) { /*guard against callers passing in null */
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
> +		if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> +			temp = pm_qos_array[pm_qos_req->pm_qos_class]->default_value;
> +		else
> +			temp = new_value;
> +
> +		if (temp != pm_qos_req->value) {
> +			pending_update = 1;
> +			pm_qos_req->value = temp;
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
> +		if (pending_update)
> +			update_target(pm_qos_req->pm_qos_class);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
> -	if (pending_update)
> -		update_target(pm_qos_req->pm_qos_class);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request);
>  
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-16 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-15  2:19 [patch] pm_qos update fixing mmotm 2010-05-11 -dies in pm_qos_update_request() mgross
2010-05-15 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-15 21:42   ` mgross
2010-05-16 22:21     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-05-17  0:12       ` mgross
2010-05-17 21:58         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201005170021.25427.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).