From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX ] ipv6: fix the bug of address check
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:31:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100517103134.06160257@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF1354A.3060003@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 17 May 2010 20:23:38 +0800
Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> If there are several IPv6 addresses with same hash value in hashlist,
> and they are all not matched with addr argument.
> In this case, ipv6_chk_addr() should return 0.
>
> This bug is introduced by commit c2e21293c054817c42eb5fa9c613d2ad51954136
> (title: ipv6: convert addrconf list to hlist).
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 3984f52..d8e5907 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struct in6_addr *addr,
> }
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> - return ifp != NULL;
> + return node != NULL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipv6_chk_addr);
>
Why not this instead. I don't like depending on the value of the
loop variable in the hlist_for_each()
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-05-17 10:27:58.218628126 -0700
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-05-17 10:29:46.012198338 -0700
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ static int ipv6_count_addresses(struct i
int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struct in6_addr *addr,
struct net_device *dev, int strict)
{
- struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp = NULL;
+ struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
struct hlist_node *node;
unsigned int hash = ipv6_addr_hash(addr);
@@ -1283,15 +1283,16 @@ int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struc
if (!net_eq(dev_net(ifp->idev->dev), net))
continue;
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ifp->addr, addr) &&
- !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
- if (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
- !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict))
- break;
+ !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE) &&
+ (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
+ !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict))) {
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ return 1;
}
}
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
- return ifp != NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipv6_chk_addr);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-17 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-17 12:23 [PATCH BUGFIX ] ipv6: fix the bug of address check Shan Wei
2010-05-17 17:31 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-05-18 0:50 ` Shan Wei
2010-05-18 1:02 ` [PATCH net-next] " Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-18 5:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100517103134.06160257@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).