From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] netns support in the kobject layer Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:11:33 -0700 Message-ID: <20100517181133.GB18721@kroah.com> References: <20100506200404.GA21805@kroah.com> <20100515.232643.212422307.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, gregkh@suse.de, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, bcrl@lhnet.ca, serue@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:34189 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755050Ab0EQSU2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 14:20:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100515.232643.212422307.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:26:43PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Greg KH > Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:04:04 -0700 > > > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:35:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> > >> With the tagged sysfs support finally merged into Greg's tree, > >> it is time for the last little bits of work to get the kobject > >> layer and network namespaces to play together properly. > >> > >> These patches are roughly evenly divided between network layer work > >> and sysfs layer work. Last time this conundrum came up I believe > >> we decided that the easiest way to handle this was for Greg to carry > >> all of the patches. David, Greg does that still make sense? > > > > That's fine, if I get David's ack on these. > > Looks good to me: > > Acked-by: David S. Miller Ok. Eric, can you resend these to me when .35-rc1 is out so I can queue them up then to get some testing in linux-next so that they can make it into .36? thanks, greg k-h