From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] bfin_mac: fix memleak in mii_bus{probe|remove} Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100518.141318.45114681.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100518092839.GA21791@coldcone> <20100518113445.GA28386@coldcone> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sonic.adi@gmail.com, michael.hennerich@analog.com, cooloney@kernel.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: kirjanov@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57744 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753404Ab0ERVNJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 17:13:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100518113445.GA28386@coldcone> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Denis Kirjanov Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:34:46 +0400 > [PATCH] bfin_mac: fix memleak in mii_bus_{probe|remove} > Fix memory leak with miibus->irq > > Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov I've already applied the original patch. Therefore, it makes no sense to send a fresh complete version of the original patch to fix this. You'll need to send a relative patch against the other one to fix the problem.