From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv6: Replace inet6_ifaddr->dead with state Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:27:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100518.152720.163227756.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100518110243.GA7750@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100518102334.70b6c0b4@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, jbohac@suse.cz, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56854 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751548Ab0ERW1L (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 18:27:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100518102334.70b6c0b4@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:23:34 -0700 > On Tue, 18 May 2010 21:04:19 +1000 > Herbert Xu wrote: > >> >> +enum { >> + INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DAD, >> + INET6_IFADDR_STATE_POSTDAD, >> + INET6_IFADDR_STATE_UP, >> + INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DEAD, >> +}; >> + >> #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > Does this really need to be visible to user applications? I'll fix this up when I apply Herbert's patches.