netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kaber@trash.net,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb V2
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:08:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527130822.02cb1661@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100527180813.GA3714@psychotron.redhat.com>

On Thu, 27 May 2010 20:08:24 +0200
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com> wrote:

> changelog:
> v1->v2
> 	- writers are locked by rtnl_lock (removed unnecessary spinlock)
> 	- using call_rcu in unregister
> 	- nicer macvlan_port_create cleanup
> 	- struct rx_hanler is made const in funtion parameters
> 
> What this patch does is it removes two receive frame hooks (for bridge and for
> macvlan) from __netif_receive_skb. These are replaced them with a general
> list of rx_handlers which is iterated thru instead.
> 
> Then a network driver (of virtual netdev like macvlan or bridge) can register
> an rx_handler for needed net device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>

I wonder if we really need the chaining.  What about allowing only one
hook per device (and return -EBUSY)?  That also gets rid of the allocation,
and the extra overhead.

The handler hook, has to be export GPL, since we really don't want more
network stack abuse by 3rd parties.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-27 18:08 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb V2 Jiri Pirko
2010-05-27 20:08 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-05-28  5:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2010-05-28  6:12     ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb V3 Jiri Pirko
2010-05-28  7:02       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-28  7:33         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb V4 Jiri Pirko
2010-06-01 15:28           ` net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb (v4) Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-01 15:41             ` Jiri Pirko
2010-06-01 16:10               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-02  7:02                 ` Jiri Pirko
2010-06-01 16:13             ` Fischer, Anna
2010-06-02  6:50               ` Jiri Pirko
2010-06-02  7:24             ` net: " Jiri Pirko
2010-06-02  7:52             ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: replace hooks in __netif_receive_skb V5 Jiri Pirko
2010-06-02 14:11               ` David Miller
2010-06-02 15:07               ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-02 15:15                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-02 20:43                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-02 16:20               ` Fischer, Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100527130822.02cb1661@nehalam \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).