From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet_mmap: expose hw packet timestamps to network packet capture utilities Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 00:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100529.001108.91328843.davem@davemloft.net> References: <09ED21B37E0F694688A2317C4FED9ED3046E444260@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <09ED21B37E0F694688A2317C4FED9ED3046E53F595@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To: scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60787 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752207Ab0E2HK5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 03:10:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <09ED21B37E0F694688A2317C4FED9ED3046E53F595@azsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Mcmillan, Scott A" Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:58:19 -0700 > There was no negative feedback on this RFC, and the corresponding > tcpdump patch was well received. Please apply. I think lack of feedback is not an indication of agreement. You sent that patch right around the openning of the merge window when people (myself included) are already overwhelmed with existing tasks. New patches aren't likely to get serious consideration during that time.