From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev/fec: fix ifconfig eth0 down hang issue Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 02:40:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20100529004013.GA12507@pengutronix.de> References: <1275037685-14555-1-git-send-email-bryan.wu@canonical.com> <20100528144506.GB13777@pengutronix.de> <4BFFDDAC.7000909@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Cc: davem@davemloft.net, afleming@gmail.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, gerg@uclinux.org, amit.kucheria@canonical.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Bryan Wu Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:60623 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753739Ab0E2AkT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 20:40:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BFFDDAC.7000909@canonical.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The performance drop issue still hangs in my brain. As soon as I have a n= ew > patch, could you please help to test? Or do you guys found any performanc= e drop > solution on your hardware? IIRC, you reported similar issue as us. Sure thing, I will test it. We use your old patch meanwhile, but I haven't looked into performance issues yet. We needed to solve other issues with th= is board so far. --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwAYm0ACgkQD27XaX1/VRt9IwCfWo08QdBeksnM5dsKv9uxeVRr /68An3qej2ps5XfOA0gbskP+8C0fVDt4 =HIyZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--