From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Fix IRQ failures during kdump.
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 19:24:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100530012401.GC9132@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529.160527.108793180.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:05:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:22:07 -0700
>
> > I think there may be more issues after thinking about it some more.
> > The device is essentially still active at this time. The PCI
> > layer can turn off certain things, but enabling INTX can lead to
> > "irq x: nobody cared" if the driver is not ready for it. The
> > device really needs to be reset by the driver to be totally
> > reliable.
>
> We still have to find some generic way to do this.
>
> My position still stands, and it is entirely rediculious to
> have every single driver have to attend to all of these
> esoteric details just to handle interrupts properly. Drivers
> are hard enough to write as-is.
I think we can do this generically. PCI has disable bits for MSI,
MSI-X and pin-based interrupts. So we can leave MSIs enabled, but disable
interrupt generation.
We should probably set the interrupt type back to pin-based before the
kexec kernel starts, right? Or do we expect drivers to handle being
initialised with the device still set to MSI mode?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-30 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-29 3:24 [PATCH] bnx2: Fix IRQ failures during kdump Michael Chan
2010-05-29 5:33 ` David Miller
2010-05-29 6:45 ` Grant Grundler
2010-05-29 6:50 ` David Miller
2010-05-29 16:22 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-29 23:05 ` David Miller
2010-05-30 1:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2010-05-30 3:49 ` David Miller
2010-05-30 9:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-30 16:32 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-29 16:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-30 9:43 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-30 16:12 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-30 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-31 4:43 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100530012401.GC9132@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).