* [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed
@ 2010-06-01 20:03 Mikael Pettersson
2010-06-01 22:32 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2010-06-01 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Matt Carlson, linux-kernel
Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:
tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
or earlier kernels.
/Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed
2010-06-01 20:03 [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed Mikael Pettersson
@ 2010-06-01 22:32 ` David Miller
2010-06-01 23:28 ` Matt Carlson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-06-01 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mikpe; +Cc: netdev, mcarlson, linux-kernel, sparclinux
Mikael I'm getting tired of continuing to add the proper
mailing list CC: for your sparc bug reports. Please make
sure to add sparclinux@vger.kernel.org to your reports
in the future.
Thanks.
> Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:
>
> tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
> PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
> ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
> ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>
> The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
> or earlier kernels.
>
> /Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed
2010-06-01 22:32 ` David Miller
@ 2010-06-01 23:28 ` Matt Carlson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matt Carlson @ 2010-06-01 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: mikpe@it.uu.se, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Carlson,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:32:09PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Mikael I'm getting tired of continuing to add the proper
> mailing list CC: for your sparc bug reports. Please make
> sure to add sparclinux@vger.kernel.org to your reports
> in the future.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:
> >
> > tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
> > PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
> > ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
> > ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
> >
> > The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
> > or earlier kernels.
These messages are originating from the PCI layer. It looks like your
device does not have NVRAM, which is a known issue. I have an idea on
how to reduce the noise, but let me investigate it a little more before
I commit to it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-01 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-01 20:03 [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed Mikael Pettersson
2010-06-01 22:32 ` David Miller
2010-06-01 23:28 ` Matt Carlson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).