From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp_generic: fix multilink fragment sizes
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20100602.083104.123416857.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4C0670E2.1090708@netservers.co.uk>
	<1275491094-9526-1-git-send-email-ben@netservers.co.uk>
	<DF7BB929B28FCF479E888E3D9F8D9E88D3E16B5A@irsmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ben@netservers.co.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
To: gabriele.paoloni@intel.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <DF7BB929B28FCF479E888E3D9F8D9E88D3E16B5A@irsmsx502.ger.corp.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: "Paoloni, Gabriele" <gabriele.paoloni@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:17:59 +0100

> The proposed patch looks wrong to me.

Can you please reply to postings properly?  Use the reply function
of your mail client and do not "top post."

Because of the way you just simply inlined the entirety of Ben's
patch posting, it ends up looking like a new patch being posted
on patchwork and this makes more work and analysis for me.

Thanks.