From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] IP: Increment INADDRERRORS if routing for a packet is not successful Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100602.091909.113727983.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1275492754.2725.192.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com To: cl@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50917 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932681Ab0FBQTA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:19:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Christoph Lameter Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:12:14 -0500 (CDT) > Its important to know why drops occur (any drops for that matter, drops > mean retransmit which means latency). We know, that's why there is a networking tracepoint that allows you to see where all drops occur. :-)