From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Subject: Re: 200 millisecond timeouts in TCP
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 02:45:28 +0200
Message-ID: <20100604004528.GH6914@nuttenaction>
References: <AANLkTils4KHXwX79cLG6UvVOaDdddMqx-1tyUL3VtLQC@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100603231002.GG6914@nuttenaction>
 <AANLkTimP3IJzLUew7avKjDq7M2imLi7QHGBwyg_2zrPo@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Ivan Novick <novickivan@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from alternativer.internetendpunkt.de ([88.198.24.89]:35914 "EHLO
	geheimer.internetendpunkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755767Ab0FDApa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:45:30 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimP3IJzLUew7avKjDq7M2imLi7QHGBwyg_2zrPo@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

* Ivan Novick | 2010-06-03 17:11:07 [-0700]:

>resending tcpdump output as attachments.

Thank you, but where did you see a spurious retransmission? I looked over the
trace and didn't find any. (it is late here, so most likely I missed it ;-)


HGN