netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Netfilter Developer Mailing List
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:56:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100610065631.GA1915@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0FA24A.7060907@trash.net>

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:16:42PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:03:17PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >   
> >> Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>     
> >>> hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to be able to sendout a single IP packet with MF flag set.
> >>>
> >>> When using RAW sockets the packet will get stuck in the
> >>> netfilter (NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT nf_defrag_ipv4 reassembly unit)
> >>> and wont ever make it out..
> >>>
> >>> I made a change which bypass the outgoing reassembly for
> >>> RAW sockets, but I'm not sure wether it's too invasive..
> >>>       
> >> That would break reassembly (and thus connection tracking) for cases
> >> where its really intended.
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Is there any standard for RAW sockets behaviour?
> >>> Or another way around? :)
> >>>       
> >> You could use the NOTRACK target to bypass connection tracking.
> >>     
> >
> > ok,
> >
> > I tried the NOTRACK target, but the packet is still going
> > throught reassembly, because the RAW filter has lower priority
> > then the connection track defragmentation..
> >   
> 
> Right.
> > I was able to get it bypassed by attached patch and following
> > command:
> >
> > 	iptables -v -t raw -A OUTPUT -p icmp -j NOTRACK
> >
> > again, not sure if this is too invasive ;)
> >   
> 
> Well, we can't change it in the mainline kernel.
> > If this is not the way, I'd appreciatte any hint..  my goal is
> > to put malformed packet on the wire (more frags bit set for a
> > non fragmented packet)
> 
> I don't have any good suggestions besides adding a flag to the IPCB
> and skipping defragmentation based on that.
ok,

I can see a way when I set this via setsockopt to the socket,
and check the value before the defragmentation..  would such a new
setsock option be acceptable?

I'm not sure I can see a way via IPCB, AFAICS it's for skb bound flags
which arise during the skb processing.

thanks,
jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-10  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-04 11:27 no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket Jiri Olsa
2010-06-04 12:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-07 14:55   ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-09 14:16     ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-09 15:15       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-09 15:16         ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-09 15:20           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-10  6:57             ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10  6:56       ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2010-06-10  9:14         ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-10  9:53           ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-10 10:04             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-11  8:16               ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-11  9:53                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-06-11 13:10                   ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15  6:53                     ` [PATCH] net: IP_NODEFRAG option for IPv4 socket Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15  7:13                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-15  9:18                         ` Jiri Olsa
2010-06-15  9:49                           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100610065631.GA1915@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).