From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [patch] enic: cleanup vic_provinfo_alloc() Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:32:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20100610093230.GM5483@bicker> References: <20100610075903.GL5483@bicker> <4C10AEE9.4090804@bfs.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Scott Feldman , Vasanthy Kolluri , Roopa Prabhu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: walter harms Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:62523 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752361Ab0FJJcl (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:32:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C10AEE9.4090804@bfs.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:22:49AM +0200, walter harms wrote: > > + vp = kzalloc(VIC_PROVINFO_MAX_DATA, flags); > > + if (!vp) > > return NULL; > > > > memcpy(vp->oui, oui, sizeof(vp->oui)); > > -- > > > This looks like memdup() ? > No. VIC_PROVINFO_MAX_DATA is larger than sizeof(vp->oui). regards, dan carpenter > re, > wh