From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100615.113940.245399246.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100610145915.721a86b7@nehalam> <20100610224839.GA22469@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100611021142.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, mst@redhat.com, frzhang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, amwang@redhat.com, mpm@selenic.com To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47028 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757391Ab0FOSja (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:39:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100611021142.GA24490@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Herbert Xu Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:11:42 +1000 > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:48:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:59:15PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> > >> > Okay, then add a comment where in_irq is used? >> >> Actually let me put it into a wrapper. I'll respin the patches. > > OK here is a repost. And this time it really is 8 patches :) > I've tested it lightly. All applied to net-next-2.6, thanks Herbert.