netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, shemminger@vyatta.com,
	mst@redhat.com, frzhang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	amwang@redhat.com, mpm@selenic.com
Subject: Re: [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:01:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616160104.GC2457@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276669281.19249.62.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:21:21AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 15 juin 2010 à 22:08 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 04:58:59AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > 
> > > Paul, could you please explain if current lockdep rules are correct, or could be relaxed ?
> > > 
> > > I thought :
> > > 
> > > rcu_read_lock_bh();
> > > 
> > > was a shorthand to
> > > 
> > > local_disable_bh();
> > > rcu_read_lock();
> > 
> > In CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_RCU, rcu_read_lock_bh() is actually
> > shorthand for only local_disable_bh().  Therefore, rcu_dereference()
> > will scream if only rcu_read_lock_bh() is held.
> > 
> > However, in CONFIG_PREEMPT_TREE_RCU, rcu_read_lock_bh() is its own
> > mechanism that does local_disable_bh() but has its own set of grace
> > periods, independent of those of rcu_read_lock().
> > 
> > > Why lockdep is not able to make a correct diagnostic ?
> > 
> > Here is the situation I am concerned about:
> > 
> > o	Task 0 does rcu_read_lock(), then p=rcu_dereference_bh().
> > 	If we make the change you are asking for, rcu_dereference_bh()
> > 	is OK with this.
> > 
> > o	Task 0 now is preempted before finishing its RCU read-side
> > 	critical section.
> > 
> > o	Task 1 removes the data element referenced by pointer p,
> > 	then invokes synchronize_rcu_bh().
> > 
> > o	Task 0 does not block synchronize_rcu_bh(), so the grace
> > 	period completes.
> > 
> > o	Task 1 frees up the data element referenced by pointer p,
> > 	which might be reallocated as some other type, unmapped,
> > 	or whatever else.
> > 
> > o	Task 0 resumes, and is sadly disappointed when the data
> > 	element referenced by pointer p has been swept out from
> > 	under it.
> > 
> > Or am I missing something here?
> > 
> 
> Nice thing with RCU is that I learn new things every day ;)
> 
> Thanks Paul, I'll try to remember all the details ! ;)

;-)

But just to be clear...  All but one use of RCU-bh is in networking,
so if you guys need something different from RCU-bh, let's talk!

And I learn something new about RCU every day as well.  One of today's
lessons is that networking is no longer the only user of RCU-bh.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-16 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-10 12:40 [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] netpoll: Set npinfo to NULL even with ndo_netpoll_cleanup Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] bridge: Remove redundant npinfo NULL setting Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] netpoll: Fix RCU usage Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] netpoll: Add locking for netpoll_setup/cleanup Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] netpoll: Add ndo_netpoll_setup Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] netpoll: Allow netpoll_setup/cleanup recursion Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 12:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] bridge: Fix netpoll support Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 14:49 ` [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-10 21:56   ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-10 21:59     ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-10 22:48       ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:11         ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 1/8] netpoll: Set npinfo to NULL even with ndo_netpoll_cleanup Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 2/8] bridge: Remove redundant npinfo NULL setting Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: Fix RCU usage Herbert Xu
2010-06-11 23:10             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 4/8] netpoll: Add locking for netpoll_setup/cleanup Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 5/8] netpoll: Add ndo_netpoll_setup Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 6/8] netpoll: Allow netpoll_setup/cleanup recursion Herbert Xu
2010-06-25  1:21             ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-25  3:01               ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-25  3:30               ` David Miller
2010-06-25  3:50                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-25  4:27                   ` David Miller
2010-06-25  4:42                     ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-25  4:52                       ` David Miller
2010-06-25  8:08                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-25  8:42                         ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-25  9:45                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-25  8:46                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-06-25 10:08                       ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 7/8] netpoll: Add netpoll_tx_running Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  2:12           ` [PATCH 8/8] bridge: Fix netpoll support Herbert Xu
2010-06-11  3:08             ` fired a bug report on bugzilla.redhat.com Qianfeng Zhang
2010-06-15 10:28             ` [PATCH 8/8] bridge: Fix netpoll support Cong Wang
2010-06-17 10:38               ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-17 10:57                 ` Cong Wang
2010-06-17 10:55                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-18  3:06                     ` Cong Wang
2010-06-11 20:03           ` [0/8] netpoll/bridge fixes Matt Mackall
2010-06-15 10:17           ` Cong Wang
2010-06-15 18:39           ` David Miller
2010-06-16  2:58             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-16  3:03               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-16  3:33                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-06-16  4:47                   ` David Miller
2010-06-16 23:02                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-17 10:18                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-17 21:26                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-16  6:16                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-16  5:08               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-16  6:21                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-16 16:01                   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-07-19 10:19           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-19 10:53             ` Herbert Xu
2010-07-19 11:54               ` Herbert Xu
2010-07-19 16:05                 ` David Miller
2010-07-19 16:52                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-19 20:35                     ` David Miller
2010-07-20  5:26                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-07-20  6:28                     ` David Miller
2010-06-29 12:53 ` Yanko Kaneti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100616160104.GC2457@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=frzhang@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).