From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 3/4] e1000e: packet split should not be used with early receive Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100621.134315.112590520.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100618045804.6728.37945.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100618045925.6728.43858.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, bphilips@novell.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52938 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758370Ab0FUUnC (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:43:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100618045925.6728.43858.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:59:27 -0700 > From: Bruce Allan > > Originally it was thought there were issues with ICHx/PCH parts with packet > split when jumbo frames were enabled but in fact it is really only when > early-receive is enabled (via ERT register) on these parts. Use packet > split with jumbos but only when early-receive is not enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan > Tested-by: Jeff Pieper > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Applied.