From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/5] sfc: Implement message level control Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100624.143332.179939286.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1277328607.2101.9.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20100623.182920.28799851.davem@davemloft.net> <1277349138.26161.144.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43998 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753442Ab0FXVdU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:33:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1277349138.26161.144.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:12:18 +0100 > I'm hoping you're going to apply > first. I'm hoping that you will always tell me about such dependencies in the future. I always work my queue out of order. If I'm heavily backlogged like I am now, I'll sometimes apply much "simpler" to review patch sets before more difficult ones, even if the "difficult" ones are older. Never assume anything, always state explicitly what tree something is for and whether dependencies exist for things as-yet not applied. Your style of assuming things makes life real difficult for me.