From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>, Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] Driver core: reduce duplicated code
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:16:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100628051606.GA16445@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinMLrXyqKZ76AiWiw6N_glrWWrP-2_aUTzQm5Xr@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:55:45PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> I suggest you to have a look into arch/arm/mach-mmp/devices.c and
> arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa{168,910}.c as well as
> arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa{168,910}.h, maybe we can find
> some common practice.
I think I like this approach in general, I already thought about not
passing all parameters as function/macro arguments, too. But maybe this
becomes too excessive for imx as I would need too many of these device
desc for the different imx variants?!
Anyhow a few things I thought when looking in the files you suggested:
- Why not use an array for all uart devdescs, maybe the code for
pxa168_add_uart could become a bit smaller then?:
extern struct pxa_device_desc pxa168_device_uart[2];
...
static inline int pxa168_add_uart(int id)
{
struct pxa_device_desc *d = pxa168_device_uart + id;
if (id < 0 || id > 2)
return -EINVAL;
return pxa_register_device(d, NULL, 0);
}
(Ditto for the other types obviously.)
- shouldn't all these pxa_device_descs and pxa168_add_$device functions
be __initdata and __init?
- pxa_register_device is better than my add_resndata function in (at
least) one aspect as it sets coherent_dma_mask, too. This is
something I missed when trying to add mxc-mmc (IIRC) devices.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1276591677-4678-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
2010-06-15 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] Driver core: reduce duplicated code Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-15 9:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-16 20:53 ` Greg KH
2010-06-18 7:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-21 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-21 21:38 ` Greg KH
2010-06-22 5:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-06-28 4:55 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-28 5:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-06-28 5:27 ` Eric Miao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100628051606.GA16445@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=anisse@astier.eu \
--cc=damm@opensource.se \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).