From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: add per bridge device controls for invoking iptables Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100630.142717.123424464.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1277729220-11775-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> <20100630142440.68adfdb1@nehalam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@vyatta.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49968 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757274Ab0F3V1E (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:27:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100630142440.68adfdb1@nehalam> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:24:40 -0700 > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:47:00 +0200 > kaber@trash.net wrote: > >> From: Patrick McHardy >> >> Support more fine grained control of bridge netfilter iptables invocation >> by adding seperate brnf_call_*tables parameters for each device using the >> sysfs interface. Packets are passed to layer 3 netfilter when either the >> global parameter or the per bridge parameter is enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy > > Looks like a good idea. > > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Acked-by: David S. Miller Patrick since this is mostly netfilter'ish, please toss it into one of your trees. Thanks!