From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] x86: Align skb w/ start of cacheline on newer core 2/Xeon Arch Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100630.142832.51275605.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100630043728.9224.64191.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, bphilips@novell.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49248 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757238Ab0F3V2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:28:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100630043728.9224.64191.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:38:00 -0700 > From: Alexander Duyck > > x86 architectures can handle unaligned accesses in hardware, and it has > been shown that unaligned DMA accesses can be expensive on Nehalem > architectures. As such we should overwrite NET_IP_ALIGN to resolve > this issue. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher Can I get an x86'er ACK on this? I can merge it in via net-next-2.6 which is probably most convenient for people who want to see the networking performance effects of this change.