From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc4-git3: Reported regressions from 2.6.34 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100708.213420.112614033.davem@davemloft.net> References: <-IGZ64uxA6G.A.P0H.bLmNMB@chimera> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, jengelh@medozas.de To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org =46rom: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:34:25 -0700 > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote= : >> >> Bug-Entry =A0 =A0 =A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 16187 >> Subject =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : Carrier detection failed in dhcpcd when li= nk is up >> Submitter =A0 =A0 =A0 : Christian Casteyde >> Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2010-06-12 15:15 (27 days old) >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/10708f37ae729baba9b67b= d134c3720709d4ae62 >> Handled-By =A0 =A0 =A0: Andrew Morton >=20 > David? This bisects to a networking commit. Doesn't look sensible, bu= t > what do I know? My suspicion is that dhcpd uses netlink to dump the info of the available links, and due to some bug gets confused with the new 64-bit statistic netlink attribute being there now. That shouldn't happen, applications should just ignore the attributes which they don't understand. I'll try to find a second to have a look at this.