From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp
Cc: segooon@gmail.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
jpirko@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tc35815: fix iomap leak
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:24:28 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100713.142428.193704758.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100713.221428.74744945.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:14:28 +0900 (JST)
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:03:18 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If tc35815_init_one() fails we must unmap mapped regions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tc35815.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> No, pcim_xxx APIs are _managed_ interfaces. These resources are
> released automatically. Actually currently nobody in kernel call
> pcim_iounmap_regions() now.
>
> And _if_ there is any reason to call pcim_iounmap_regions()
> explicitly, it should be called in tc35815_remove_one() too.
>
> So, NAK.
I've reverted this patch, thanks.
Can someone go over the other similar patches I applied already to
net-next-2.6 to see if they have the same problem? If so I'll revert
them too.
BTW, I think from one perspective the pcim_*() APIs make it harder to
audit a driver because resource management is magic and implicit
rather than explicit. It adds an extra step to the audit, and I
don't see any effort being made to do a mass conversion of all
drivers to pcim_xxx which would be the only way in my mind for this
to truly make it easier to audit drivers for resource leak problems.
If both driver types (pcim_xxx and non-pcim_xxx) exist, it just means
more work for auditors as they have oen more thing to check for
instead of less things.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-10 10:03 [PATCH] tc35815: fix iomap leak Kulikov Vasiliy
2010-07-13 3:33 ` David Miller
2010-07-13 13:14 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2010-07-13 21:24 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100713.142428.193704758.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=segooon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).