From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Net: ethernet: eth: fix some code style issues Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100714.182630.48510763.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1279138937-12985-1-git-send-email-chihau@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, opurdila@ixiacom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-devel@vger.kernel.org, mitov@issp.bas.bg To: chihau@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41659 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758067Ab0GOB0O (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:26:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1279138937-12985-1-git-send-email-chihau@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Chihau Chau Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:22:17 -0400 > @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ __be16 eth_type_trans(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) > * seems to set IFF_PROMISC. > */ > > - else if (1 /*dev->flags&IFF_PROMISC */ ) { > + /*dev->flags&IFF_PROMISC */ > + else if (1) { This makes the code look worse, not better. If the commented test is in the parenthesis, it is unambiguous which piece of code the suggested test is meant for.