From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, paul.moore@hp.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Add post recvmsg() hook.
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:06:11 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100721.220611.267376790.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007220502.o6M52GJU098071@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:02:16 +0900
> Then, why does below proposal lose information?
Peek changes state, now it's possible that two processes end up
receiving the packet.
Please consider deeply how your desired semantics are unobtainable
without breaking thigngs fundamentally.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-16 16:14 [RFC] LSM hook for post recvmsg Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-16 19:35 ` David Miller
2010-07-17 1:17 ` [PATCH] LSM: Add post recvmsg() hook Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-17 20:34 ` Paul Moore
2010-07-18 8:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-18 10:49 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-18 21:25 ` David Miller
2010-07-19 4:25 ` [PATCH] LSM: Add post accept() hook Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-19 22:15 ` Paul Moore
2010-07-20 1:36 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-20 19:52 ` Paul Moore
2010-07-21 2:00 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-21 16:06 ` Paul Moore
2010-07-21 18:45 ` [PATCH] LSM: Add post recvmsg() hook David Miller
2010-07-22 3:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-22 4:06 ` David Miller
2010-07-22 4:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-22 4:45 ` David Miller
2010-07-22 5:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-22 5:06 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-07-22 12:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-22 17:22 ` David Miller
2010-07-22 17:26 ` David Miller
2010-07-23 0:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-23 5:44 ` David Miller
2010-07-23 7:21 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-07-23 7:29 ` David Miller
2010-07-23 12:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100721.220611.267376790.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).