From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: fubar@us.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pedro.netdev@dondevamos.com, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] bonding: change test for presence of VLANs
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:12:59 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100722.141259.262780053.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279750488-32611-1-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com>
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:14:47 -0700
> After commit:
>
> commit ad1afb00393915a51c21b1ae8704562bf036855f
> Author: Pedro Garcia <pedro.netdev@dondevamos.com>
> Date: Sun Jul 18 15:38:44 2010 -0700
>
> vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)
>
> it is now regular practice for a VLAN "add vid" for VLAN 0 to
> arrive prior to any VLAN registration or creation of a vlan_group.
>
> This patch updates the bonding code that tests for the presence
> of VLANs configured above bonding. The new logic tests for bond->vlgrp
> to determine if a registration has occured, instead of testing that
> bonding's internal vlan_list is empty.
>
> The old code would panic when vlan_list was not empty, but
> vlgrp was still NULL (because only an "add vid" for VLAN 0 had occured).
>
> Bonding still adds VLAN 0 to its internal list so that 802.1p
> frames are handled correctly on transmit when non-VLAN accelerated
> slaves are members of the bond. The test against bond->vlan_list
> remains in bond_dev_queue_xmit for this reason.
>
> Modification to the bond->vlgrp now occurs under lock (in
> addition to RTNL), because not all inspections of it occur under RTNL.
>
> Additionally, because 8021q will never issue a "kill vid" for
> VLAN 0, there is now logic in bond_uninit to release any remaining
> entries from vlan_list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Applied.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 22:14 [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] bonding: change test for presence of VLANs Jay Vosburgh
2010-07-21 22:14 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 2/2] bonding: don't lock when copying/clearing VLAN list on slave Jay Vosburgh
2010-07-22 21:13 ` David Miller
2010-07-22 21:12 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100722.141259.262780053.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pedro.netdev@dondevamos.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).