From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: CONNMARK getsockopt/setsockopt functionality Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20100723145051.GA13807@pc0043.bmw-carit.intra> References: <20100721072006.GA17965@pc0043.bmw-carit.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from toronto053.server4you.de ([62.75.220.53]:46323 "EHLO toronto053.server4you.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575Ab0GWOu4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:50:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.bmw-carit.de [62.245.222.98]) (Authenticated sender: wagi) by toronto053.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0190454198 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100721072006.GA17965@pc0043.bmw-carit.intra> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, > There used to be a way to mark packets in userspace by invoking the > setsocketopt with SO_CONNMARK as it was proposed by Krisztian [1]. > This code was superseeded by Jan's work [2]. Now I wonder how I get > the same result out of the new code. Something with conditions? Silly me, the above statement is completely wrong. I was looking for SO_MARK which is obviously still there. Sorry for the noise. thanks, daniel