From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RxRPC: Fix a potential deadlock between the call resend_timer and state_lock
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:55:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804.215510.258099641.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100804123417.29580.95095.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 13:34:17 +0100
> RxRPC can potentially deadlock as rxrpc_resend_time_expired() wants to get
> call->state_lock so that it can alter the state of an RxRPC call. However, its
> caller (call_timer_fn()) has an apparent lock on the timer struct.
>
> The problem is that rxrpc_resend_time_expired() isn't permitted to lock
> call->state_lock as this could cause a deadlock against rxrpc_send_abort() as
> that takes state_lock and then attempts to delete the resend timer by calling
> del_timer_sync().
>
> The deadlock can occur because del_timer_sync() will sit there forever waiting
> for rxrpc_resend_time_expired() to return, but the latter may then wait for
> call->state_lock, which rxrpc_send_abort() holds around del_timer_sync()...
>
> This leads to a warning appearing in the kernel log that looks something like
> the attached.
>
> It should be sufficient to simply dispense with the locks. It doesn't matter
> if we set the resend timer expired event bit and queue the event processor
> whilst we're changing state to one where the resend timer is irrelevant as the
> event can just be ignored by the processor thereafter.
...
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 12:34 [PATCH] RxRPC: Fix a potential deadlock between the call resend_timer and state_lock David Howells
2010-08-05 4:55 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804.215510.258099641.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).