From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't destroy TCP sockets twice Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:24:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20100810102421.GA28030@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20100806110511.GA16448@basil.fritz.box> <20100809213002.GA23736@gondor.apana.org.au> <20100810083040.GB6801@basil.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:51304 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754818Ab0HJKY5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:24:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100810083040.GB6801@basil.fritz.box> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:30:40AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: . > This simple patch demonstrates double destroy. I have patches for showing > the more complicated case too, but they're much more ugly. Andi, I know you're seeing the problem, but I need to udnerstand why, and this patch doesn't really answer the why part :) So did you figure out why was calling it first (I presume you know who called it the second time since you've got the back trace)? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt