From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:37:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100811153736.GA31577@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100811112706.GA6772@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:27:06AM -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:03:30AM -0400, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > To use rcu_read_lock safely we'd also need to add do synchronize_rcu
> > in addition of synchronize_rcu_bh, right Paul?
> >
> > Of course as we were doing this unsafely prior to my patch anyway
> > I'm also fine with just reverting it.
>
> Actually, we could just disable IRQs for stable. How about this
> patch (untested)?
>
> netpoll: Disable IRQ around RCU dereference in netpoll_rx
>
> We cannot use rcu_dereference_bh safely in netpoll_rx as we may
> be called with IRQs disabled. We could however simply disable
> IRQs as that too causes BH to be disabled and is safe in either
> case.
>
> Thanks to John Linville for discovering this bug and providing
> a patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This also seems to work for me.
John
P.S. As pointed-out elsewhere, my patch neglected to change
synchronize_rcu_bh to synchronize_rcu in netpoll.c. If some fault
is found w/ Herbert's patch then I can post a modified version of mine.
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-11 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 20:25 [PATCH] netpoll: use non-BH variant of RCU John W. Linville
2010-08-10 20:43 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-10 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-10 23:31 ` David Miller
2010-08-11 11:03 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-11 11:27 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-11 15:37 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-08-12 6:16 ` David Miller
2010-08-11 12:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-11 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-12 6:09 ` David Miller
2010-08-12 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-13 14:39 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-13 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-08-13 17:51 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-15 6:50 ` David Miller
2010-09-02 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-09-03 15:34 ` David Miller
2010-09-03 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100811153736.GA31577@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).