netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: make TCP quick ACK behavior modifiable
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:57:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823195742.GA5896@nuttenaction> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100823121449.29419771@nehalam>

* Stephen Hemminger | 2010-08-23 12:14:49 [-0700]:

>If this is configurable (still not sure about having yet more
>TCP knobs). It should either be per-socket or a route metric so it can
>be controlled on a per-path basis.

Hello Stephen,

I thought about this too. But IMHO it makes no sense because interactive/bulk
characteristic do not depend on the "path". Rather it depends on application
level. Furthermore, how should an administrator configure this on a per path
basis? The administrator knows that he runs a WEB server - great . And then
SHOULD disable Quick ACK and everything is fine, think about typical server
setup.

The only remunerating alternative is to disable TCP quick ACK at all for the
_first_ server ACK. So that the standard delayed ACK is active and therefore
the mechanism can detect if the flow is interactive or not. The drawback is
that for bulk data flows the first ACK is "artificial" delayed. This is the
superior solution IMHO.

Anyway, I think that for most server setup these days (HTTP, SMTP, ...) the
TCP Quick ACK mechanism is contra-productive. Vanilla bulk data transfer
protocols are rarer these days.

Hagen


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-23 19:00 [PATCH] tcp: make TCP quick ACK behavior modifiable Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 19:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-23 19:57   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2010-08-23 20:08   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 21:21     ` David Miller
2010-08-23 21:51       ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 22:04         ` Chris Snook
2010-08-23 22:16         ` David Miller
2010-08-23 20:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-23 20:49   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 21:10   ` Chris Snook
2010-08-23 22:01     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 22:19       ` Chris Snook
2010-08-23 22:23         ` David Miller
2010-08-23 22:26           ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2010-08-23 23:17           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2010-08-23 23:18             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823195742.GA5896@nuttenaction \
    --to=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).