From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3] gro: __napi_gro_receive() optimizations Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100826.213816.112615295.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20100825.135726.189708768.davem@davemloft.net> <1282770911.2681.205.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1282883713.2501.29.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35639 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752002Ab0H0EiA (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:38:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1282883713.2501.29.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:35:13 +0200 > + fold |= *(unsigned long *)(a + 6) ^ *(unsigned long *)(b + 6); Shouldn't these be "+ 8" instead of "+ 6"?