netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: tunnels should use rcu_dereference
@ 2010-08-30 21:07 Eric Dumazet
  2010-09-01 17:58 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-08-30 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev

tunnel4_handlers, tunnel64_handlers, tunnel6_handlers and
tunnel46_handlers are protected by RCU, but we dont use appropriate rcu
primitives to scan them. rcu_lock() is already held by caller.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tunnel4.c |   13 +++++++++----
 net/ipv6/tunnel6.c |   11 ++++++++---
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c b/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
index 59186ca..9edaa82 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tunnel4.c
@@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ int xfrm4_tunnel_deregister(struct xfrm_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm4_tunnel_deregister);
 
+#define for_each_tunnel_rcu(head, handler)		\
+	for (handler = rcu_dereference(head);		\
+	     handler != NULL;				\
+	     handler = rcu_dereference(handler->next))	\
+	
 static int tunnel4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct xfrm_tunnel *handler;
@@ -80,7 +85,7 @@ static int tunnel4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct iphdr)))
 		goto drop;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel4_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel4_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->handler(skb))
 			return 0;
 
@@ -99,7 +104,7 @@ static int tunnel64_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
 		goto drop;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel64_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel64_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->handler(skb))
 			return 0;
 
@@ -115,7 +120,7 @@ static void tunnel4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 {
 	struct xfrm_tunnel *handler;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel4_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel4_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->err_handler(skb, info))
 			break;
 }
@@ -125,7 +130,7 @@ static void tunnel64_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info)
 {
 	struct xfrm_tunnel *handler;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel64_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel64_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->err_handler(skb, info))
 			break;
 }
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c b/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
index fc3c86a..c4edbff 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tunnel6.c
@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ int xfrm6_tunnel_deregister(struct xfrm6_tunnel *handler, unsigned short family)
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm6_tunnel_deregister);
 
+#define for_each_tunnel_rcu(head, handler)		\
+	for (handler = rcu_dereference(head);		\
+	     handler != NULL;				\
+	     handler = rcu_dereference(handler->next))	\
+
 static int tunnel6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct xfrm6_tunnel *handler;
@@ -95,7 +100,7 @@ static int tunnel6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
 		goto drop;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel6_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel6_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->handler(skb))
 			return 0;
 
@@ -113,7 +118,7 @@ static int tunnel46_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(struct iphdr)))
 		goto drop;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel46_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel46_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->handler(skb))
 			return 0;
 
@@ -129,7 +134,7 @@ static void tunnel6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 {
 	struct xfrm6_tunnel *handler;
 
-	for (handler = tunnel6_handlers; handler; handler = handler->next)
+	for_each_tunnel_rcu(tunnel6_handlers, handler)
 		if (!handler->err_handler(skb, opt, type, code, offset, info))
 			break;
 }



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: tunnels should use rcu_dereference
  2010-08-30 21:07 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: tunnels should use rcu_dereference Eric Dumazet
@ 2010-09-01 17:58 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-09-01 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: eric.dumazet; +Cc: netdev

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:07:25 +0200

> tunnel4_handlers, tunnel64_handlers, tunnel6_handlers and
> tunnel46_handlers are protected by RCU, but we dont use appropriate rcu
> primitives to scan them. rcu_lock() is already held by caller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-01 17:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-30 21:07 [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: tunnels should use rcu_dereference Eric Dumazet
2010-09-01 17:58 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).