From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, markine@google.com,
chavey@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] bonding: fix workqueue re-arming races
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:20:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901192026.GA3151@del.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901191106.GB25227@midget.suse.cz>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:11:06PM +0200, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:00:37PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 05:37:30PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 05:18:56PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 03:30:56PM +0200, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:23:56PM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > > > > On 2010-08-31 22:54, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > > > > > > What prevents this from deadlocking such that cpu A is in
> > > > > > > bond_close, holding RTNL and in cancel_delayed_work_sync, while cpu B is
> > > > > > > in the above function, trying to acquire RTNL?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I guess this one isn't cancelled in bond_close, so it should be safe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nah, Jay was correct. Although this work item is not explicitly
> > > > > cancelled with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), it is on the same
> > > > > workqueue as work items that are being cancelled with
> > > > > cancel_delayed_work_sync(), so this can still cause a deadlock.
> > > > > Fixed in the new version of the patch by putting these on a
> > > > > separate workqueue.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Maybe I miss something, but the same workqueue shouldn't matter here.
> > >
> > > Hmm... I missed your point completely and Jay was correct!
> >
> > Hmm#2... Alas, after getting back my sobriety, I've to say that Jay
> > was wrong: the same workqueue shouldn't matter here. Similar things
> > are done by other network code with the kernel-global workqueue, eg.
> > in tg3_close(), rhine_close() etc.
>
> But these don't do rtnl_lock() inside the work item, do they?
Exactly. Just like work items cancelled from bond_work_cancel_all()
after your patch.
Jarek P.
> That is the main issue here: dev_close() is called with rtnl held
> and so it cannot wait for completion of work items that grab rtnl
> themselves.
>
> --
> Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-01 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-31 17:07 [RFC] bonding: fix workqueue re-arming races Jiri Bohac
2010-08-31 20:54 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-01 12:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 13:30 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-01 15:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 15:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 19:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 19:11 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-01 19:20 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-01 19:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 19:46 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-01 20:06 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 13:16 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-01 17:14 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-01 18:31 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-01 20:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-01 20:56 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-02 0:54 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-02 17:08 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-09-09 0:06 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-16 22:44 ` Jay Vosburgh
2010-09-24 11:23 ` Narendra K
2010-10-01 18:22 ` Jiri Bohac
2010-10-05 15:03 ` Narendra_K
2010-10-06 7:36 ` Narendra_K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100901192026.GA3151@del.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chavey@google.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=markine@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).