From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: don't do GRO on second port
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:33:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100902083327.GA6246@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100901.145151.93454549.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:51:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> The only scenerio you can guarentee that all packets for a given
> flow key will be treated the same is the one where the input device
> is the same as well.
>
> When there is a single napi --> device mapping, it works, but without
> that invariant it doesn't.
Do you mean a single napi can't be used eg. for vlan_gro and napi_gro?
(napi_gro handles flows for skb->dev different from napi->dev or I
miss something?)
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-02 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-27 20:50 [PATCH] net: Fix vlan_gro_frags vs netpoll and bonding paths Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-28 0:13 ` Herbert Xu
2010-08-28 9:44 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-28 10:54 ` [RFC] gro: Is it ok to share a single napi from several devs ? Eric Dumazet
2010-08-28 14:31 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-28 14:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-28 15:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-28 17:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-28 21:41 ` David Miller
2010-08-28 22:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-28 22:33 ` David Miller
2010-08-29 9:59 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-29 17:06 ` David Miller
2010-08-29 18:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-30 6:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-30 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-30 16:50 ` David Miller
2010-08-30 17:51 ` [PATCH] sky2: don't do GRO on second port Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-30 19:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-01 21:51 ` David Miller
2010-09-01 21:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-09-02 9:18 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 16:30 ` David Miller
2010-09-02 16:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 8:33 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-02 9:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 9:55 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 10:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 11:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 12:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 12:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-02 17:08 ` David Miller
2010-09-02 21:26 ` Herbert Xu
2010-09-03 5:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-02 9:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-30 18:36 ` [RFC] gro: Is it ok to share a single napi from several devs ? Jarek Poplawski
2010-08-30 19:59 ` [RFC] netpoll: " Eric Dumazet
2010-08-30 20:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-08-30 20:19 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100902083327.GA6246@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).