From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: don't do GRO on second port Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 08:33:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20100902083327.GA6246@ff.dom.local> References: <20100830.095012.233695092.davem@davemloft.net> <20100830105117.0f0cf140@nehalam> <20100830190900.GA3141@del.dom.local> <20100901.145151.93454549.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:55594 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752520Ab0IBIdf (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2010 04:33:35 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so373679bwz.19 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100901.145151.93454549.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 02:51:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > The only scenerio you can guarentee that all packets for a given > flow key will be treated the same is the one where the input device > is the same as well. > > When there is a single napi --> device mapping, it works, but without > that invariant it doesn't. Do you mean a single napi can't be used eg. for vlan_gro and napi_gro? (napi_gro handles flows for skb->dev different from napi->dev or I miss something?) Jarek P.