netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, ole@ans.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: dont set inet_rcv_saddr in connect()
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:51:46 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100907.225146.232739797.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1283920965.2634.723.camel@edumazet-laptop>

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:42:45 +0200

> Problem is AF_UNSPEC always clears the remote address (as stated in
> manual), and sometimes local one (as not stated)
> 
> if (!(sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_BINDADDR_LOCK))
> 	inet_reset_saddr(sk);
> 
> This is the workaround that was coded years ago in Linux to undo the
> local addr setting ;)

Ok, I mis-remembered about AF_UNSPEC, I thought BSD did it too, it
does not.

But we really offer the most flexibility here because we offer this.

In BSD case, connect() on an already connect()'d UDP socket
unconditionally zaps the local address setting (because, as Stevens
states, that local address "might" have been created by a previous
connect()).

This forces the application to re-bind() the local address if it wants
to use something other than what connect() is going to choose.

We leave the local settings alone for normal connect() on already
connect()'d sockets, and provide connect(AF_UNSPEC) to explicitly kill
connect() created local and remote associations.

This allows bind() settings to survive through multiple connect()
calls if the user wants, a facility BSD does not provide.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-08  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-06 17:11 2.6.34: Problem with UDP traffic on lo + poll(?) Krzysztof Oledzki
2010-09-06 19:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-06 19:55   ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-06 20:29     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-06 20:44       ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-06 20:48         ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-07 15:37           ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-07 16:36             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 19:20               ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-07 19:26               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 19:59                 ` David Miller
2010-09-07 21:35                   ` [PATCH] inet: dont set inet_rcv_saddr in connect() Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 21:52                     ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-08  2:16                       ` David Miller
2010-09-08  4:13                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08  2:34                     ` Brian Haley
2010-09-08  3:34                       ` David Miller
2010-09-08  4:42                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08  5:51                           ` David Miller [this message]
2010-09-08  4:57                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08  5:36                         ` David Miller
2010-09-08  5:52                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08 10:10                             ` [PATCH] udp: add rehash on connect() Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08 15:06                               ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-08 15:17                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08 15:29                                   ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-08 15:08                               ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-09-08 16:52                                 ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-09  4:39                                   ` David Miller
2010-09-08 14:27                             ` [PATCH] inet: dont set inet_rcv_saddr in connect() Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 21:28                 ` 2.6.34: Problem with UDP traffic on lo + poll(?) Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-07 21:39                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07 21:51                     ` Krzysztof Olędzki
2010-09-08  4:12                       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100907.225146.232739797.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ole@ans.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).