From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: error27@gmail.com
Cc: ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com, sivakumar.subramani@exar.com,
sreenivasa.honnur@exar.com, jon.mason@exar.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] vxge: potential NULL dereference
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:32:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100910.133255.137830993.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100910115423.GC5959@bicker>
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:54:23 +0200
> At the start of the function we test whether the "vpath" is NULL but we
> need another test here as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> This is a static checker bug, I'm not sure if we ever pass a NULL
> pointer for "vpath".
I cannot see any case where this can happen. There are two
cases:
1) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_device_begin_irq(),
which looks like:
ret = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(
&hldev->virtual_paths[i], skip_alarms);
that vpath pointer first argument will never be NULL.
2) __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process() is invoked via vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process()
which uses:
status = __vxge_hw_vpath_alarm_process(vp->vpath, skip_alarms);
All vpath valid active vpath handles always have a non-NULL vp->vpath
virtual path back pointer, as setup by vxge_hw_vpath_open():
...
vp->vpath = vpath;
...
*vpath_handle = vp;
attr->fifo_attr.userdata = vpath->fifoh;
attr->ring_attr.userdata = vpath->ringh;
return VXGE_HW_OK;
So we can simply remove the first NULL check as this can never actually
be NULL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-10 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-10 11:54 [patch] vxge: potential NULL dereference Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 20:32 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-09-10 21:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-09-10 21:32 ` Jon Mason
2010-09-10 21:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100910.133255.137830993.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=jon.mason@exar.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com \
--cc=sivakumar.subramani@exar.com \
--cc=sreenivasa.honnur@exar.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).