From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 00/10] sfc changes for 2.6.37 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100912.222904.189705956.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1284136817.2267.93.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20100910.122854.184831961.davem@davemloft.net> <1284148790.2267.322.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41652 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750874Ab0IMF2q (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:28:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1284148790.2267.322.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:59:50 +0100 [ talking about standard netdevice statistic meanings ] > It would really be nice to have more verbose definitions of these in > rtnetlink.h. The decider for us was that ifconfig includes > rx_over_errors in RX frame errors i.e. bad packets. I completely agree.