netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jarkao2@gmail.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:59:20 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100920.095920.52212843.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100920072149.GA6353@ff.dom.local>

From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:21:49 +0000

> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:17:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> We definitely don't use frag lists for performance, if you look
>> in the GRO history the GRO code specifically has been changed
>> to prefer accumulating into the page vector whenever possible
>> because using frag lists is a lot slower.
> 
> Yes, and GRO made frag lists more popular btw.

Yes.  However, realize that this is only really a legacy from
inet_lro.

These drivers could restructure themselves to operate on pages.
I am pretty sure the hardware would be amicable to this and it
would likely improve performance just as favoring page vector
accumulation did for GRO.

> Btw, I wonder what is the exact reason we can't use only
> NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET?

As Eric explained, and then demonstrated, it generates a non-trivial
increased amount of code.

This is almost certainly why Arnaldo didn't make it unconditional
back when he implemented the SKB data offset changes for 64-bit.

In my opinion, this duality of SKB pointer handling never causes
real problems because any change mistakenly accessing the pointers
directly usually gets caught by the first person who builds it on
64-bit :-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-20 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03  3:43 [PATCH] net: Frag list lost on head expansion David Miller
2010-09-03  5:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03  6:19   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03  9:09   ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization Eric Dumazet
2010-09-03 13:46     ` David Miller
2010-09-07  2:20       ` David Miller
2010-09-07  5:02         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-07  5:05           ` David Miller
2010-09-07  9:16           ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-07  9:37             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-10 19:54               ` David Miller
2010-09-11 12:31                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12  3:30                   ` David Miller
2010-09-12 10:45                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 10:58                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 15:58                       ` David Miller
2010-09-12 16:13                         ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:57                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 22:08                             ` David Miller
2010-09-13  7:49                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-12 19:55                         ` Ben Pfaff
2010-09-12 20:24                           ` David Miller
2010-09-12 20:45                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20  0:17                   ` David Miller
2010-09-20  7:21                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20  9:02                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20  9:14                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 12:12                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-20 12:40                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 16:59                       ` David Miller [this message]
2010-09-07  1:25     ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-22 19:12 [PATCH] Fix corruption of skb csum field in pskb_expand_head() of net/core/skbuff.c Andrea Shepard
2010-07-23  5:09 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: pskb_expand_head() optimization Eric Dumazet
2010-07-25  4:06   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100920.095920.52212843.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).