netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:12:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100921091248.GA8424@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285018272.2323.243.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On 2010-09-20 23:31, Eric Dumazet wrote:
...
> [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation
> 
> We should not set frag->destructor to sock_wkfree() until we are sure we
> dont hit slow path in ip_fragment(). Or we risk uncharging
> frag->truesize twice, and in the end, having negative socket
> sk_wmem_alloc counter, or even freeing socket sooner than expected.
> 
> Many thanks to Nick Bowler, who provided a very clean bug report and
> test programs.
> 
> While Nick bisection pointed to commit 2b85a34e911bf483 (net: No more
> expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx), underlying bug is older.
> 
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/ip_output.c  |    8 ++++----
>  net/ipv6/ip6_output.c |   10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index 04b6989..126d9b3 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -490,7 +490,6 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
>  	if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
>  		struct sk_buff *frag;
>  		int first_len = skb_pagelen(skb);
> -		int truesizes = 0;
>  
>  		if (first_len - hlen > mtu ||
>  		    ((first_len - hlen) & 7) ||
> @@ -510,11 +509,13 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
>  				goto slow_path;
>  
>  			BUG_ON(frag->sk);
> -			if (skb->sk) {
> +		}
> +		if (skb->sk) {
> +			skb_walk_frags(skb, frag) {
>  				frag->sk = skb->sk;
>  				frag->destructor = sock_wfree;

Nice catch, but it seems doing it in the first loop as now, and
reverting changes before goto slow_path might be more optimal here.

Jarek P.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-21  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-20 17:44 Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 19:52   ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:00     ` David Miller
2010-09-20 21:23       ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:17     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 21:31       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21  6:16         ` [PATCH] ip : take care of last fragment in ip_append_data Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 23:38           ` David Miller
2010-09-22  4:44             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-22  4:53               ` David Miller
2010-09-24 21:42           ` David Miller
2010-09-21  9:12         ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-21  9:21           ` Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21  9:38             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21  9:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:07                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:48                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 11:58                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 12:39                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 14:05         ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-21 14:16           ` [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 15:58             ` [PATCH v3] ip: " Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 16:26               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 16:31                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 18:09                   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 19:24                     ` David Miller
2010-09-21 23:06                       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 17:50               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 18:47                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 19:21                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 22:15                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100921091248.GA8424@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).