From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ip: fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:50:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100921175014.GA2066@del.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285084705.2617.636.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 05:58:25PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hmm, while looking at git history, I found commit from Patrick
> b2722b1c3a893e (ip_fragment: also adjust skb->truesize for packets not
> owned by a socket)
> As my patch reverts it, we probably want a more polished patch.
>
> (Also port Patrick work to ipv6)
>
> So here is a V3
>
> [PATCH v3] ip: fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation
>
> Special care should be taken when slow path is hit in ip_fragment() :
>
> When walking through frags, we transfert truesize ownership from skb to
> frags. Then if we hit a slow_path condition, we must undo this or risk
> uncharging frags->truesize twice, and in the end, having negative socket
> sk_wmem_alloc counter, or even freeing socket sooner than expected.
>
> Many thanks to Nick Bowler, who provided a very clean bug report and
> test program.
>
> Thanks to Jarek for reviewing my first patch and providing a V2
>
> While Nick bisection pointed to commit 2b85a34e911 (net: No more
> expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx), underlying bug is older
> (2.6.12-rc5)
>
> A side effect is to extend work done in commit b2722b1c3a893e
> (ip_fragment: also adjust skb->truesize for packets not owned by a
> socket) to ipv6 as well.
>
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
> Tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> CC: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> ---
> net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index 04b6989..a643f7a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -488,9 +488,8 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> * we can switch to copy when see the first bad fragment.
> */
> if (skb_has_frags(skb)) {
> - struct sk_buff *frag;
> + struct sk_buff *frag, *frag2;
> int first_len = skb_pagelen(skb);
> - int truesizes = 0;
>
> if (first_len - hlen > mtu ||
> ((first_len - hlen) & 7) ||
> @@ -503,18 +502,18 @@ int ip_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, int (*output)(struct sk_buff *))
> if (frag->len > mtu ||
> ((frag->len & 7) && frag->next) ||
> skb_headroom(frag) < hlen)
> - goto slow_path;
> + goto slow_path_undo;
Looks better and better to me, except, checkpatch complains about the
(existing) indentation fault here (and later), but I guess you've seen
that?
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-21 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-20 17:44 Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 19:52 ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:00 ` David Miller
2010-09-20 21:23 ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-20 20:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-20 21:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 6:16 ` [PATCH] ip : take care of last fragment in ip_append_data Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 23:38 ` David Miller
2010-09-22 4:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-22 4:53 ` David Miller
2010-09-24 21:42 ` David Miller
2010-09-21 9:12 ` Regression, bisected: reference leak with IPSec since ~2.6.31 Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 9:38 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 9:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 10:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 11:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 12:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 14:05 ` Nick Bowler
2010-09-21 14:16 ` [PATCH] ip : fix truesize mismatch in ip fragmentation Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 15:58 ` [PATCH v3] ip: " Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 16:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 16:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 18:09 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 19:24 ` David Miller
2010-09-21 23:06 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-09-21 17:50 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-09-21 18:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-09-21 19:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-09-21 22:15 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100921175014.GA2066@del.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).