From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: sk_{detach|attach}_filter() rcu fixes Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100927.215157.260083160.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1285603064.3017.42.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1285603650.3017.57.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56041 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441Ab0I1Evg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:51:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1285603650.3017.57.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:07:30 +0200 > Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 =E0 17:57 +0200, Eric Dumazet a =E9crit : >> sk_attach_filter() is run with socket locked. >>=20 >> Use the appropriate rcu_dereference_protected() instead of blocking = BH, >> and rcu_dereference_bh(). >> There is no point adding BH prevention and memory barrier. >=20 > Hmm, same thing can be done in sk_detach_filter, here is a v2. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] net: sk_{detach|attach}_filter() rcu fixes >=20 > sk_attach_filter() and sk_detach_filter() are run with socket locked. >=20 > Use the appropriate rcu_dereference_protected() instead of blocking B= H, > and rcu_dereference_bh(). > There is no point adding BH prevention and memory barrier. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied.