From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be aborted Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20100927081358.07b30327@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <1285345323-4250-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1285357868.12594.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "Chatre, Reinette" , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , "Berg, Johannes" , Zhu Yi , "Cahill, Ben M" , "netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1285357868.12594.8.camel@wwguy-ubuntu> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:51:08 -0700 "Guy, Wey-Yi" wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Thanks for sending the patch, the scan operation in iwlwifi just being > modified and the changes you have no longer apply.please check the > latest kernel. > > Thanks > Wey > Ok, I checked out git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-2.6.git and it definitely looks better in there. This patch shouldn't be necessary for that. Do you plan on submitting this for 2.6.36 or .37? I think my patch should fix the instance reported in the bug in a less invasive manner. Only remaining question is why it did only show up now. But that's probably due to the workqueue changes. Regards, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html